Electronic Document Preservation For Lawsuits - E-Discovery Obligations

May 2nd, 2008

As soon as litigation is contemplated or threatened, it is essential for all parties and their counsel to go beyond paper file searching, and consider what electronic data and information exists that may need to be disclosed. Rules of Court generally require all parties to litigation to disclose to the other parties all relevant documents, whether the documents are helpful or hurtful to any particular party. Relevance is the test for disclosure. There are a limited number of exemptions to this rule. A discussion of these exceptions is beyond the scope of this article.

Documents are defined in the Rules of Court to include electronic files and data. Accordingly, in addition to locating and preserving paper documents, each party to a lawsuit must take reasonable steps to locate and preserve electronic files containing data and information that can reasonably be expected to be relevant in the litigation. Further, a litigant should also consider whether specific paper or electronic documents are known to be in the possession of others. Court rules provide specific procedures to request that such documents be disclosed and preserved as early as possible.

Once litigation is commenced, a party is mandated to immediately take reasonable and good faith steps to preserve relevant documents, including electronic files and data. In respect of electronic files and data, these steps include the following:

(a) collect all relevant document retention, back-up, archiving and destruction policies;

(b) issue appropriate instructions to all staff, or at least to relevant staff, to cease or suspend personal activities and practices that could result in the destruction or modification of relevant electronic documents, such as the deletion of e-mailbox entries or archives;

(c) create litigation copies of potentially relevant active data sources, for example by means of electronic backup or forensic copying of the documents, so as to preserve potentially relevant meta-data; and,

(d) cease or suspend the overwriting of back-up tapes, and other document retention practices that could result in the destruction or modification of relevant electronic documents in the ordinary course of business.

If a litigant anticipates that specific electronic documents, files or data could exist that are relevant to the litigation and are liable to be deleted or modified in the ordinary course of business, that litigant must immediately notify its counsel of that fact, and take appropriate steps to preserve these electronic files, documents and data. A litigant should also consider, as early as possible, whether third parties may be in possession of relevant electronic files and data, and seek advice about notifying the third parties to take appropriate preservation steps.

This article is not intended to be relied on as legal advice. Anyone involved in litigation, or about to be involved in litigation, should consult with legal counsel regarding all of their disclosure obligations that may be applicable to the particular circumstances.

Read more

Posted in Cyber Criminal | No Comments »

Fraud Websites & Investment Scams

May 2nd, 2008

Recognizing The Signs of Fraud

Financial scams have been on the rise around the world, and unfortunately, have been rising in sophistication. Fraud was introduced to the Internet most notably by the Nigeria 411 scams, i.e. advance fee fraud. That was then, this is now.

Scammers today are using worldwide access to the Internet to their advantage. Accounts such as webhosting a new website, bank and credit accounts can now be easily opened on the Internet, from any location. Having some false identification gives the scammer the upper hand here, as he has essentially created an alias with little, if any, traceable information.

The False Website Approach

Many financial scams are taking the form of the classic advance fee fraud, but with a higher level of sophistication and tactics. Websites are often created with templates or a design is stolen from another reputable and legal investment company. Once the site is complete, the criminal has created what appears to be a legitimate website and company. The headquarters for these fictitious firms are often located in the United States, so the website claims. These sites are mearly a tool for fraud.

How to distinguish a real investment website from a fraudulent one? Search Google and Yahoo for the company to determine if there are other sites referencing the firm. Check the site itself to see if the firm has contact information. A website without an address or phone number is a red flag for potential fraud or scam. Search phone directories for the firm’s telephone number. Lastly, check with the SEC’s website for signs on how to recognize these investment scams, and to verify registration of the firm.

Knowing the Signs of Fraud

Although the level of sophistication in these scams continues to rise, an educated consumer can know the difference. Scammers today always contact their victims with an offer - the potential victim has been selected. The firm representative may speak perfect English, and even understand investments and asset management. He may even request you submit an IRS form and other documents. Bottom line, this person will request personal data and/or payment promptly and without ever meeting you. Be skeptical and ask for the firms’ references and SEC filing.

Getting Verification

If you’ve searched the Internet for references, checked local phone listings, maybe even contacted the SEC for verification, and spoke with company representatives and claimed references - and you’re still not sure? Contact a professional investigation company, like Wymoo International or Philippine PI for help. Get the facts on who your dealing with - then decide.

All the Best,

S. Birch

Read more

Posted in Cyber Criminal | No Comments »